About CasinoCloneCheck
CasinoCloneCheck is an independent information service. We trace crypto casinos to the operators actually behind them, so a fresh brand name can't hide a long record.
What CasinoCloneCheck is
CasinoCloneCheck is an independent resource that traces a crypto casino back to its real operator. For a given brand we work out the operating company, the parent group it sits under, the sister brands run off the same backend, and the licence it holds. The point is simple: you should know who you are dealing with before you deposit, not after a withdrawal goes wrong.
The narrow focus is deliberate. We do not write general casino reviews, score game lobbies, or chase the latest welcome bonus. Plenty of sites already do that. We answer one question instead, in depth: who is behind this site, and what is their history? Our home page shows the current findings at a glance, and how to check walks through doing it yourself.
Why provenance matters
A brand-new casino has no reviews, no track record, and no community history. That absence reads as a clean slate, but it rarely is one. The same operator may have years of history under three other names, complete with the complaints and payment problems that came with them. Provenance is what connects the shiny new front to that older record.
White-label re-skins make this routine. One operator licenses a platform, then launches a dozen near-identical brands with different logos and colours over a single shared backend. Many brands, one backend. Spotting that link tells you a "new" site is really an old operation wearing fresh paint, and it tells you which other brands share its fate. Our white-label guide explains how these clusters form.
How we work
Research is compiled by the CasinoCloneCheck Research Desk. That is a brand and an editorial standard, not a single byline, and we do not invent named experts to dress up the work. What matters is the evidence, not a face next to it.
The standard is plain. Every ownership, group, or sister-brand claim cites a public source with a date, or it reads "verifying" until we have one. We trace operators from footers and terms, from regulator registers, and from the verbatim clauses and shared cashiers that give a clone away. When a field cannot be evidenced yet, we leave it marked rather than fill it with a guess. The full process lives in our methodology.
Honesty and fairness
Naming an operator carries weight, so we keep the language neutral. We never call a brand a "scam" or a "clone" as an accusation. We state structure as a dated fact: which company runs the site, which group it belongs to, which brands share its platform. A flag against any non-partner brand needs hard evidence and a genuine right of reply before it goes up.
That cuts both ways. We publish negative findings too, including the ones that clear a brand. "X is not linked to Y" is a finding worth stating when a rumour says otherwise, and we run it with the same sourcing as everything else. Being even-handed is the whole value of an independent desk.
How it's funded
The site is free to use. We may earn a commission when a reader signs up through a marked Duel link, at no extra cost to you. That commission never changes a provenance finding, a label, or the order in which facts appear. The money follows the research; the research does not follow the money.
To keep that boundary visible, any brand we might earn from is labelled "established": a recognised operator that is not a clone or a re-skin of a known-bad site, with the commercial link disclosed in plain words at the point you would click it. You always know which links pay us and which do not.
Contact and corrections
Provenance changes, and so do we. If you hold a source that updates a finding, or you run a brand we have named and want to exercise your right of reply, get in touch. We read corrections, cite the source, and date the change. Gambling carries risk whoever the operator turns out to be, so please read our responsible gambling page and our privacy policy alongside any finding here.